Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of the three counseling channels with regard to media features

From: The potential of Second Life for university counseling: a comparative approach examining media features and counseling problems

 

Comparison

Mean differences (I-J)

SE

p value

95% confidence interval

Channel (I)

Channel (J)

Lower

Upper

Anonymity

Traditional

Internet

− 3.69*

.16

.000

− 4.25

− 3.13

SL

− 3.86*

.16

.000

− 4.45

− 3.30

Internet

SL

− 0.17

.16

.557

− 0.73

0.39

Choice of appearance

Traditional

Internet

1.91*

.20

.000

1.21

2.61

SL

− 1.41*

.20

.000

− 2.10

− 0.71

Internet

SL

− 3.32*

.20

.000

− 4.01

− 2.62

Choice of counselors

Traditional

Internet

0.11

.17

.808

− 0.50

0.73

SL

− 1.69*

.17

.000

− 2.30

− 1.07

Internet

SL

− 1.80*

.17

.000

− 2.42

− 1.19

Interactivity

Traditional

Internet

5.17*

.14

.000

4.68

5.65

SL

2.95*

.14

.000

2.46

3.44

Internet

SL

− 2.22*

.14

.000

− 2.70

− 1.73

Convenience in time

Traditional

Internet

− 3.01*

.14

.000

− 3.49

− 2.53

SL

− 3.10*

.14

.000

− 3.58

− 2.61

Internet

SL

− 0.08

.14

.826

− 0.57

.40

Convenience in place

Traditional

Internet

− 3.07*

.14

.000

− 3.57

− 2.57

SL

− 3.49*

.14

.000

−3.99

−2.99

Internet

SL

− 0.42

.14

.011

− 0.92

.078

Privacy of counseling site

Traditional

Internet

− 1.02*

.16

.000

− 1.59

− 4.53

SL

− 1.56*

.16

.000

− 2.13

− 1.00

Internet

SL

− .54

.16

.003

− 1.11

.02

Diversity of counseling sites

Traditional

Internet

− 0.94*

.16

.000

− 1.50

− 0.38

SL

− 3.13*

.16

.000

− 3.69

− 2.56

Internet

SL

− 2.19*

.16

.000

− 2.75

− 1.63

Availability of counseling objects

Traditional

Internet

2.01*

.18

.000

1.38

2.63

SL

− 0.69*

.18

.001

− 1.31

0-.06

Internet

SL

− 2.69*

.18

.000

− 3.32

− 2.06

  1. Note: p values have been adjusted with the Bonferroni method
  2. *p < .05