Skip to main content

Table 4 Overall performance of various ML models using different word embedding on training data (P, R, F denotes Precision, Recall, and F1 score, respectively)

From: Automated doubt identification from informal reflections through hybrid sentic patterns and machine learning approach

 

LR

CNN

CNN-LSTM

LSTM

Word Embedding

P

R

F

P

R

F

P

R

F

P

R

F

Selected data with doc2vec embedding

0.76

0.75

0.75

0.62

0.61

0.61

0.8

0.78

0.78

0.69

0.64

0.61

Selected data with glove pre-trained word embedding

0.46

0.46

0.46

0.60

0.60

0.59

0.74

0.73

0.73

0.83

0.82

0.82