Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 ANCOVA results, multiple comparisons, and mean differences in Q-L2SRL posttest for Q-L2SRL pretest

From: Computer-Supported Meta-reflective Learning Model via mathematical word problem learning for training metacognition

Source df SS MS F P
Q-L2SRL pretest 1 .33 .33 1.03 .31
Groups 2 80.97 40.48 127.13 .00
Error 97 30.89 .32   
Comparisons   Mean difference SE P Bonferroni Adjusted 95% CI
CREMA vs CNTRL   2.20* .138 <.001 1.86, 2.53
CREMA vs CNTRL+MetaQ   1.18* .137 <.001 .85, 1.52
CNTRL+MetaQ vs CNTRL   1.01* .138 <.001 .68, 1.35
  1. R2 = .73, Adj. R2 = .72
  2. Comparisons based upon ANCOVA adjusted means controlling for Q-L2SRL-pretest mean of 1.1108
  3. * p < .05, where p-values are adjusted using the Bonferroni method