Skip to main content

Table 5 ANCOVA results, multiple comparisons, and mean differences in Q-L2SRL posttest for Q-L2SRL pretest

From: Computer-Supported Meta-reflective Learning Model via mathematical word problem learning for training metacognition

Source

df

SS

MS

F

P

Q-L2SRL pretest

1

.33

.33

1.03

.31

Groups

2

80.97

40.48

127.13

.00

Error

97

30.89

.32

  

Comparisons

 

Mean difference

SE

P

Bonferroni Adjusted 95% CI

CREMA vs CNTRL

 

2.20*

.138

<.001

1.86, 2.53

CREMA vs CNTRL+MetaQ

 

1.18*

.137

<.001

.85, 1.52

CNTRL+MetaQ vs CNTRL

 

1.01*

.138

<.001

.68, 1.35

  1. R2 = .73, Adj. R2 = .72
  2. Comparisons based upon ANCOVA adjusted means controlling for Q-L2SRL-pretest mean of 1.1108
  3. * p < .05, where p-values are adjusted using the Bonferroni method