Table 1 Example of Mueller’s concept map scoring rubric rationale
From: Design and development of semi-automatic concept map authoring support tool
Score | Rationale |
|---|---|
Legible—easy to read and free of spelling errors | |
2 (No) | Spelling errors less than 30% |
Accurate—concepts used accurately | |
4 (A few inaccuracies) | Less than 20% of inaccuracies |
Complete—sufficient number of relevant concepts and relationships | |
0 (Limited use of concepts/ relationships) | The concepts cover less than 20% of relevant idea, regardless its relationship correctness. |
Sophisticated—finding meaningful connections between relevant concepts | |
7 (Some meaningful connections made) | More than 10 correct and relevant relationships identified, nicely arranged elements, easy to understand propositions, almost cover all of important ideas from the text. |